Senin, 11 Oktober 2010
Sleep Post Correction
An astute commenter pointed out that I misread the numbers in the paper on sleep and fat loss. I wrote that out of the total 3.0 kg lost, the high-sleep group lost 2.4 kg as fat, and the low-sleep group lost 1.4 kg of fat out of 2.9 kg total.
In fact, the high-sleep group lost 1.4 out of 2.9 kg as fat, and the low-sleep group lost 0.6 out of 3.0 kg as fat. So I got the numbers all mixed up. Sorry for the mistake. The main point of the post still stands though: sleep deprivation negatively influences body composition.
The correct numbers are even more interesting than the ones I made up. Even in the high-sleep group, nearly half the body weight lost by simple calorie restriction was lean mass. That doesn't make calorie restriction look very good!
In the sleep-deprived group, 80% of the weight lost by calorie restriction came out of lean mass. Ouch!
That illustrates one of the reasons why I'm skeptical of simple calorie restriction as a means of fat loss. When the body "wants" to be fat, it will sacrifice lean mass to preserve fat tissue. For example, the genetically obese Zucker rat cannot be starved thin. If you try to put it on a severe calorie-restricted diet, it will literally die fat because it will cannibalize its own lean mass (muscle, heart, brain, etc.) to spare the fat. That's an extreme example, but it illustrates the point.
The key is not only to balance energy intake with expenditure (which the brain does automatically when it's working correctly), but to allocate energy appropriately to lean and fat mass.
In fact, the high-sleep group lost 1.4 out of 2.9 kg as fat, and the low-sleep group lost 0.6 out of 3.0 kg as fat. So I got the numbers all mixed up. Sorry for the mistake. The main point of the post still stands though: sleep deprivation negatively influences body composition.
The correct numbers are even more interesting than the ones I made up. Even in the high-sleep group, nearly half the body weight lost by simple calorie restriction was lean mass. That doesn't make calorie restriction look very good!
In the sleep-deprived group, 80% of the weight lost by calorie restriction came out of lean mass. Ouch!
That illustrates one of the reasons why I'm skeptical of simple calorie restriction as a means of fat loss. When the body "wants" to be fat, it will sacrifice lean mass to preserve fat tissue. For example, the genetically obese Zucker rat cannot be starved thin. If you try to put it on a severe calorie-restricted diet, it will literally die fat because it will cannibalize its own lean mass (muscle, heart, brain, etc.) to spare the fat. That's an extreme example, but it illustrates the point.
The key is not only to balance energy intake with expenditure (which the brain does automatically when it's working correctly), but to allocate energy appropriately to lean and fat mass.
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Entri Populer
-
All this talk about butter is making me hungry. Richard mentioned in the comments that he bought some ghee recently and has been enjoying ...
-
I'll be out of town until the beginning of November, so I won't be responding to comments or e-mails for a while. I'm going to ...
-
Insulin is an important hormone. Its canonical function is to signal cells to absorb glucose from the bloodstream, but it has many other ef...
-
The house mouse Mus musculus is an incredible research tool in the biomedical sciences, due to its ease of care and its ability to be genet...
-
Dr. Edward Mellanby's book Nutrition and Disease contains a chapter titled "Nutrition and Infection". It begins: There is g...
-
I recently did a written interview for the website Bizymoms.com. It was the first time I had been invited to do an interview, so I figured ...
-
In the comments of the last post, we've been discussing the relationship between body fatness and diabetes risk. I think this is really...
-
I bumped into a fascinating paper today by Dr. Loren Cordain titled "Plant-Animal Subsistence Ratios and Macronutrient Estimations in ...
-
One pound of human fat contains about 3,500 calories. That represents roughly 40 slices of toast. So if you were to eat one extra slice of...
-
Kitava is a Melanesian island that has maintained an almost entirely traditional, non-industrial diet until very recently. It was the subje...
Labels
- April fool's (3)
- archaeology (10)
- book review (6)
- cancer (20)
- Cardiovascular disease (71)
- celiac (17)
- cholesterol (14)
- cob (1)
- dementia (2)
- dental health (21)
- diabetes (50)
- diet (245)
- disease (105)
- diseases of civilization (19)
- environment (5)
- evolution (7)
- exercise (23)
- fat-soluble vitamins (40)
- fats (100)
- Food reward (57)
- Food reward Fridays (8)
- French paradox (9)
- gardening (1)
- genetics (18)
- gluten (27)
- gout (1)
- Hadza (3)
- hormesis (5)
- hyperphagia (42)
- hypertension (12)
- infection (5)
- Inuit (8)
- Kitava (17)
- Kuna (3)
- lard (4)
- lectins (4)
- leptin (17)
- liver (19)
- low-carb (32)
- Masai (7)
- meditation (7)
- metabolic syndrome (21)
- minerals (17)
- native diet (58)
- natural building (1)
- nutritionism (2)
- overweight (130)
- paleolithic diet (27)
- phytic acid (12)
- Pima (7)
- presentations (5)
- real food (33)
- research bloopers (4)
- salad (1)
- San (3)
- sleep (1)
- smoking (1)
- soup stock (2)
- success stories (7)
- superstimuli (14)
- thrift (10)
- thyroid (1)
- Tokelau (11)
- yogurt (2)

0 komentar:
Posting Komentar